Thursday, March 24, 2016

Trump's America-first worldview forgoes lofty ideals and partisan ideologies and it's correct

Trump's ideas don't fit neatly into or subscribe to any single theory or school of international relations thought. Being unafraid to question the status quo, Trump’s outlook on global affairs and the U.S. role in them is, however, quite simple: Clearly, Trump argues, the U.S. is doing something wrong. If we're so great and powerful, why have we appeared so helpless in Ukraine, in Korea, in the South China Sea, and East China Sea? America has the most powerful military in the world, why are terrorists expanding their Islamic state? Trump questions failed trade policies that hurt American workers who are now jobless, Trump says why not seek to renegotiate and rebalance the playing field?

Here's a link to an establishment talking point dealing with Japan and it's wrong (Rubio used it in debate); Establishment Talking Point Wrong On Issue Of Japan

The United Nations, NATO and internationalists claim that the U.S. needs to continue leading the liberal order. They claim it creates a healthy global system from which America and her allies benefit. Trump, on the other hand, sees absurdity in a system filled with cracks and fissures that arguably disadvantage Americans, and madness in positions born out of ideological politics rather than what's needed. Like the people in America who vote for American Leadership, Trump has tired of leaders who once elected forget about serving Americans and start acting like they need a favorable world opinion for a run at some global Presidency. Have they forgotten the pledge of allegiance to America?

Trump is correct on NATO and not only Japan as linked above. By slashing their defense budgets European countries are allowing the U.S. to pick up the slack. And why not, American welfare frees them to spend on social programs America can't even afford. The United States is already spending more on defense than all other nations on the planet combined. Yet, America needs upgrades that it can't afford such as a new fighter jet in the face of a modernizing China and a superioir Russian fighter already in production. America already scrapped making its best fighter the F-22 in favor of a cheaper F-35 that now needs to be replaced. Where will that money come from?

Here's something crazy, U.S. leaders actually fight against Europe providing for its own defense. See; European Union’s Common Security and Defence Policy.  Some in establishment will argue that European nations are to small to defend themselves, they've obviously got blinders on because Israel's small and proivides for it's own defense? Israel buys our weapons and we don't have or need bases in Israel. It's time Europeans do the same.  Not over night and nothing rash, but it must be done for their own survival. It might help our own survival as well.  New alliances will be forged and Americans need not fear that or dictate to whom they are with. Americans will find new alliances as well based on mutual respect and its own need.

The extra money European countries have available because Americans pay for their defense tab, funds social programs that attract immigrants from the very countries that often wish them harm. The "free money" fuels the world order mentality. A place where lets face it Europeans are viewed as a blight on the world because they are members of the haves club. With a stronger world integration Europeans will find they have a smaller voice because they have a smaller population compared to the countries they are allowing themselves to integrate with.

That's true to America as well.  Americans aren't liked much in the world and like European nations we need to worry less about what the world thinks and more about America. We can either be wealthy and strong as a nation or poor and prosecuted as a nation. World opinions about privilege are not favorable to Americans. Make no mistake the world will take all privilege away from Americans. That's going to be the outcome if business continues as usual.

On the immigration issue, Japan has low to no terrorism for a reason.  They don't encourage Muslim immigration.

American establishment types will never admit these truths unless the vote is clear in 2016!

Friday, March 18, 2016

Arizona’s Martha McSally Would Be A Great Choice For Trump's Vice President




She’s the first female Air Force fighter pilot to fly in combat, a retired colonel who once sued the Pentagon over a policy on Muslim dress, and a self-described moderate who rails against government overreach.

McSally often tells audiences about how she sued Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld over a requirement that female servicewomen wear a headscarf and an abaya, a traditional body-covering robe worn by many conservative Muslim women, when traveling off base in Saudi Arabia. McSally had internally asked for changes to the policy for years, but filed a lawsuit in late 2001 after spending some time being posted in the country. The policy was eventually overturned.

During her 2012 campaign for a House seat in Arizona’s swing 2nd District , in a questionnaire from a conservative group, McSally said she supported repealing Obamacare and prohibiting abortion except when it was necessary to prevent the death of the mother.

Related; Martha McSally's Border Security Bill Punishes Cartel Look-Outs

Thursday, March 17, 2016

Ted Cruz Exposed



Cruz special interests;

$15 million donation from Farris and Dan Wilks
$11 million from Robert Mercer
$10 million from Toby Neugebauer

Ted's wife's in bed with Goldman Sachs as Vice President (on leave for Ted's 2016 campaign) of the Houston, Texas chapter of the company. How's it that Ted's going to rally against "crony capitalism"?

Ted's wife helped support NAFTA a deal where American jobs fled the country in favor of a low cost labor force. If Ted's wife won't repudiate her open borders stances from south to north the Cruz vote should start defecting. And another thing, Ted said he didn't like the Councel on Foreign Relations. Did he forget his wife Heidi is on the counsel? An organization fighting to destroy American soverinity and that's according to Ted himself.

While free trade sounds great to establishment types, it destroys Americas own political control and ability to self govern. It gives political control over to a world population that has great distaste for Americans. European countries are facing the same destructive forces and the establishment won't back down even as European culture is destroyed and its own citizens are attacked by the open borders this global policy has created.

Ted's foreign policy consists of lets "bomb the crap out of them" while that may sound good to many patriotic Americans and that includes Trump supporters, at least have a plan for the clean up and stabilization afterwards Ted.

Ted Cruz lie; "I'll rip up the Iran deal on day one in office". Since China, Russia and America's European allies signed the treaty they won't re-establish sanctions unless America waits for a proven violation as Trump understands and has pointed out to Ted. No one wants that treaty torn apart more than Trump, however, at least Trump's honest by sayiny, "because of Obama Americans must now wait for a violation of a bad treaty before we can rip it up".

Ted seems a lot like a member of the establishment elite club he professes to dislike on the campaign trail?

Scathing read; Report Ted tried to Bury

As usual Ted is telling ‘fairy tales’...
End the strangle hold by voting Trump in 2016.

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Trump In Perspective: Past Republican Establishment And Leftist Hatred For Ronald Reagan



The left hates any Republican that draws the same large crowds as Donald Trump. So, take all future Trump protests for what they are, displays of hatred for anything American and especially anything pro common bonds and culture.

Example of the lefts hatred for Republicans; Radio host advocates murder of Ted Cruz

Since both Trump and Cruz are hated equally by the left it makes more sense for Republicans to stay with front runner Trump. Ted Cruz seen by his followers as a "real conservative" is a bad idea for Republicans if the goal is wrestling the Whitehouse away from Democrats. Cruz's past actions handed Democrats some mid term talking points and elections and Cruz knew it would. Yet, Cruz put himself first and ahead of country, given the chance he'd do it again. See; In it for himself

Related; Wake up Ted, it's time to make the phone call to Trump. Maybe, request Secretary of State? If you put yourself first again the establishment wins. In that case you will have made yourself and Trump irrelevant. That's clearly not what Americans in the Republican party have been voting for.

Cruz should think about that for a moment before he continues bashing the Republican front runner.

John Kasich is the last hope for the anti Trump\Cruz establishment and a brokered convention. Ask yourself Ted is Kasich what you want to force on Americans? Kasich's an open border champion and a failed national candidate who only won his home state due to the establishments hatred of Donald Trump.

VIDEO REVEALS RONALD REAGAN DEALING WITH LEFTIST PROTESTERS…DOES THIS REMIND YOU OF TRUMP?

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Hillary Clinton Race Baiting As Usual

Hillary Clinton refuses to cultivate a new thought process even after the below comments were made available to her by Alveda King



Yesterday, in her 2016 presidential bid Clinton says, "Trump rallies are like old Lynch mobs and people haven't forgotten about them it's in their DNA".

Is her intent to stir up and stengthen a racial divide? That's the effect, she knows it and if she doesn't know it, is she smart enough to be president? Won't this encourage others to attack Trump supporters?

Who gets the blame when her followers provoke those trying to attend a private Trunp rally? A fact Clinton left out; the supporters she and others in her party stir up to a level of hatred, travel or head out to Trump rallies, Guess they miss being lynched using or applying Clinton's logic?

Trump's appeal is broader than a single race in the first place. Look how close minded the left is when confronted by the facts.



Clinton is in fact race baiting. Will the media question President Obama, asking whether or not he thinks it's acceptable behavior in his own party? Will that happen? Of course it won't, it's become racist to raise questions based on facts vs years of acceptable thought control. Americans know Obama does indeed support such behavior and engages in that behavior himself.

Only Republican party leaders like House Speaker Paul Ryan get questions about campaign rally violence from the media. What's Ryan choose to do? He defecates all over the front runner (Trump) vs calling out the double standard. If that's not a Republican in name only (RINO) what is? It's also cowardice, however, Ryan would spin it (acting like a Democrat) to say Trump's divisive in an effort to cover his own behind.

If Trump does lose the nomination or the general election it's not from lack of appeal. It will be from his own party leaders who failed to support the front runner. Are these leaders so ignorant they don't understand support vs attack and the eventual effect?

The worse part is they understand and they don't care! It's self vs country on display for all to see.

Like Trump today, some from the left tried to silence Reagan back in the day! See video;



The Republican party leaders were men back then and didn't accuse Reagan of causing the violence.

Monday, March 14, 2016

Black Police Officer Jacai Colson Slain By Blacks, Where's The Outrage?

Malik and Michael Ford fatally shot 28 year old Officer Jacai Colson in an ambush near the departments headquarters in Prince George’s County, Maryland. Is it time for Barrack Obama to speak out against leftist black violence yet?  Of coarse not the left can do whatever they want with media blessing and silence from the right!

Malik and Michael Ford, both from Temple Hill, were taken into custody after the killing Sunday. Michael Ford's rap sheet has more than a dozen charges, including theft, trespass, public urination and possession of drug paraphernalia, court records show.

Details of Malik Ford's criminal history were not immediately clear.

Colson, a 28-year-old undercover narcotics officer who worked on the force for four years, was shot outside a police station Sunday afternoon. A fellow officer put Colson in a police cruiser and rushed him to a hospital, where he died.

One of the brothers was taken into custody after being shot but is expected to survive. The other was apprehended at a Popeyes fast food restaurant a half mile from the crime scene, police said.

The shooting was an 'unprovoked' attack and one of America's finest defenders lost his life in defense of the community. Prince George’s County State’s Attorney Angela Alsobrooks in turn called the shooting an ‘act of cowardice’ and an ‘horrific act of evil.’

“Our officers were going about their business and were attacked,” Chief Henry Stawinski said.“Those officers did not shrink. They bravely advanced and engaged this individual who was threatening not just the police officers and the police facility that he was opening fire upon but numerous members of the community in the area.”

Do you believe these brothers were simply insane or something even worse?

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Would Leftist Protesters Have Beaten Trump To Death In Chicago last night?

Without security the answer is YES, they are violent leftists!   It isn't Donald Trump who needs to condemn his supporters or his own actions. Trump and his supporters are clearly not the folks traveling to a private rally looking for confrontation. Trump has asked for unity already. The last debate was toned down, not because of his opponents effort,  rather it was Trump's effort in the face of continued attacks by already defeated candidates seeking a brokered convention.

Ben Carson recently signed on the Trump train by endorsing Donald publicly underscoring the point he believes Trump to be inclusive.  It's not Donald Trump's supporters who head out to Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders rallies with the intent to silence a disenting point of view. It's worth pointing out here that pandering to "minorities" in America is a racist action in itself and it inflames tensions because it's taking sides based on race. Today who's really the minority anyway?  European Americans are no longer the majority in the U.S. school system.

Who's the divisive one when President Barrack Obama, who was obviously tickled pink, went right on television after learning an orginized leftist mob forced Trump to cancel his rally? A cancellation recommended by local law enforcement citing safety concerns. Obama was overwhelming joyful as he addressed the nation once again to express his false outrage, all the while pointing fingers at the Republican party and Trump. Obama conveniently overlooked  the race pandering in his own party.

Example; Hillary's been all about pointing her finger at Republican Governor Snyder in the Michigan drinking water fiasco. Hillary says if it was a rich "white" town involved he'd have acted. But, do you know what Hillary doesn't bring up? The city with its majority "black" population was run into economic ruin by Democrats, oh snap, she didn't mention that did she? If that's not leftist race pandering what is?  But hey, Flint will makes a great political backdrop to stir up blacks.

Has Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders or even President Obama called for restraint from their own party?  Have they asked their militant jack booted thugs to stay away from Trump rallies?  Has the media conducted strong questioning about this? Of course not! You can't hold the compassionate party to being commpasionate because they aren't.

Republicans in name only (RINO's) bear much of the blame also! They've played the race card in trying to silence Trump thus showing they've become the Democrat Lite party. RINO's like Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, John Kasich, and even "conservative" Ted Cruz exploit racism from the left for political gain. They've all broken their pledge to support the eventual party nominee by accusing Trump of racism in a shameless smear campaign. Though, they know Trump's clearly not a racist it doesn't stop them. Even Al Sharpton says he doesn't think Trump is a racist!

Already the media, RINO's, Obama, and left leaning Democrats are trying to place the blame someplace else. For political gain they are trying to paint this as a clash between Trump and Sander's supporters and not on the leftist fascism they clearly support.  Don't let them practice hate speech from the left, while shifting the blame to Trump or anyone else. Get out and vote!

Freedom of speech matters. No matter how angry anyone is! The thought police have no right to threaten political rallies. The hate speech isn't coming from the right it's coming from the left and the Oval Office.  It's comming from those who want open borders and by those who use open borders as a means to try and change America.  They attempt to destroy anyone who would dare speak against them.

Here's a typical leftist protester (pictured below) playing the race card to try and silence a political point of view he doesn't like. Any wonder Trump would like to punch him in the face? Who's at who's rally?



God Bless Donald Trump! Trump who stands up for Americans first amendment rights while others haven't. God Bless "minorities" like Ben Carson who buck the establishment and the thought police. God bless all shades of Americans who see the truth!!

This campaign is fighting for the soul of the Republican party and our country.  We the voters in the Republican party and our brother blue collar Democrats stand with Trump and will stand by our vote against the establishment!!

Related; Leftist Thugs Gear Up Again

Friday, March 11, 2016

Trump Detractors Worried About Rally Scuffles But Ignore Violent Crime Caused By Open Borders?

The media's false outrage rears its ugly head over an incident at a Donald Trump rally. Yes, a protester was assualted and Yes, Trump said he hoped his comments had nothing to do with the action by one of his many supporters.

Comments Trump had made at a different rally were brought up by media members unhappy with Trump's blunt and often unapologenic speech.

Here's why the media outrage is false.

1. Although Trump made comments the media considers inflammitory, he did so at a different rally and under different circumstances.

 2. Protesters sneaking into Trump rallies are making a consious decision to protest without permit and inside a private event. Also, they know the views they espouse are exactly the opposite of those being supported at the event. In this case the protester happened to be black and the attacker white. Those intellectually honest with themselves know "white on black violence" draws media attention.

 3. If the media wants outrage to be considered authentic it should be applied to all violence equally. Example; Black Lives Matter members recently attacked a war hero leaving a McDonalds. This attack should have brought questions equally to Barrack Obama. Why? Because, Obama shortly after the attack hosted a Black Lives Matter group at the Whitehouse, nothing from the media? Obama was never asked if his silence is in itself condoning these acts?  In this attack the victim is white and not protesting anyone just minding his own business. Multiple black attackers targeted him... a hate crime?



4. Did the media forget leftwing violence at the 2008 Republican convention?  Donald Trump was not even running for office?

Interestingly, violent protests inside western nations often come from those with a leftist aganda and the media sides wth the agenda. These leftist protesters often wish to change or get rid of some common bond the nation currently holds dear. Example; Saying "Merry Christams" is common in western culture, yet, comes under protest.  The media calls out the backlash against such protest as racist or wrong thinking? It's like the media is at a sporting event where the response gets the penalty because they missed the original offense. The diference here is the penalty is given more harshly only to the response even though the original offense was seen? Example; racism towards whites seems to be expected and accepted as if it weren't racist, whereas a backlash from the victim who's white is penalized as racist.  Here's a case in point; Proof whites suffer with discrimination

Violence against dissenters at political rallies is wrong, at least when no violent action was initiated on the part of the dissenter. That's not been the case at all Trump rallies. In the Trump rally mentioned by the media the Trump supporter acted wrongly...  Being an univited loudmouth protester is also wrong.  Two wrongs don't make a right... enough said life goes on. Trump did not condone the attack in this case. The incident would not have occured in the first place had the protester remained outside and not inside a private event that was highly charged politically and emotionally. This protester knew what he was doing.

How would right wing protesters fare inside a large leftwing rally? In some crowds dead!

Donald Trump promised supporters at ONE rally with some not so nice protesters that if they “knock the crap out of” a protester, he will cover their legal fees: “Just knock the hell— I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise, I promise. It won’t be so much ’cause the courts agree with us too.”

To answer a question - No, Trump does not have to cover legal fee's at a different event. Had the protester been violent towards someone then "yes" for the heck of it Trump probably would cover costs. Remember protesters have often thrown objects.  They're not saints and in fact go out looking for trouble and often get what they deserve. To heck with the media's false outrage.

Related see; Trump supporter charged after sucker-punching protester at North Carolina rally

Wednesday, March 9, 2016



Donald Trump is a husband, father and grandfather who deeply loves this country, is putting his life on the line and spending his own money because he wants to make America great again. Why, one would think from all the hysteria and comparing Trump to Hitler it has never been the policy of the U.S. government to prohibit certain individuals from coming into our country.

ISLAM, BY LAW IS PROHIBITED FROM US IMMIGRATION


Trump: It's not racist to enforce our immigration law and before what's happening in Europe happens to America!

An invading military would be less effective at destroying a nation

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Trump Is No Racist, However, Obama Is And The Establishment Republicans Are Silent

What Barrack Hussein Obama does not understand is that everyone has equal opportunity under capitalism.

Being born in unfortunate circumstances does not prevent a person from becoming successful. It just doesn’t. “A reasonable shot at economic success” already exists, and it is not cavalier to say so. Upward mobility is a reality that is easily observed in the countless rags-to-riches stories that dot Americana. People have risen from the slums to become wealthy. Fortunes have been made despite all kinds of physical and even mental incapacitation. The only true impairment is a lack of motivation, and that is not the responsibility of an economic system, or government, to fix.

See; Barack Obama Is An Anti-White Racist

True "hope and change" would have been born from a conservative black President. Where's the change in electing a black President who believes blacks today are still victims of white racism as most leftists believe? Just look at how the leftist Hillary Clinton also known as the "Hildabeast" blames the Flint Michigan water mess on Republicans vs blaming the real source of the problem.

Blacks overwhelmingly are loyal to the Democratic Party, so forget Republican voters, focus on the return on investment for blacks over the past 50 years for their undying slap stupid loyalty. Oh yeah, the Democratic debate took place in "Flint Michigan" and Hillary blamed the water issue on Republicans and especially Governor Synder, but do you know what Hillary, Bernie nor the moderators brang up? The city with its majority black population was run into economic ruin by Democrats, oh snap they didn't mention that did they? Cash strapped Flint was desperate to save cash because of their dire economic situation, so they stopped burying water from Detroit and got it from a river, correct? For the record, no Republican had been mayor of Flint or Detroit in about 40 to 50 years. Just fact checking. But hey, Flint will make a great political backdrop to stir up blacks even though their cities economic depressed blighted mess is self inflicted.

Lets not forget to throw in "free" gifts another form of racism designed by the left while on the campaign trail.  Why is that racist?  It's racist because the left is grouping people they have determined can't succeed together. Next the left targets that group with the promise of "free gifts". Of course they've taken forcibly that "free gift" from some other group who they've decided succeed a little to much.  Everyone knows nothings really free right? Right???

At Secretive Undemocratic Meeting, Tech CEOs And Top Republicans Commiserate, Plot To Stop Trump

Karl Rove focus group  gives GOP establishment chance to thwart the will of the primary voters.


Described unimaginatively but accurately as "opulent," Sea Island, Georgia, hosted a gaggle of Republican leaders and tech CEOs for the American Enterprise Institute's annual World Forum.

Billionaires, tech CEOs and top members of the Republican establishment flew to a private island resort off the coast of Georgia this weekend for the American Enterprise Institute's annual World Forum, according to sources familiar with the secretive gathering.

The main topic at the closed-to-the-press confab? How to stop Republican voters choice in front-runner Donald Trump.

Apple CEO Tim Cook, Google co-founder Larry Page, Napster creator and Facebook investor Sean Parker, and Tesla Motors and SpaceX honcho Elon Musk all attended. So did Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), political guru Karl Rove, House Speaker Paul Ryan, GOP Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.), Cory Gardner (Colo.), Tim Scott (S.C.), Rob Portman (Ohio) and Ben Sasse (Neb.), who recently made news by saying he "cannot support Donald Trump."  (why should voters care who he supports? He doesn't care that voters support Trump)

Along with Ryan, the House was represented by Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton (Mich.), Rep. Kevin Brady (Texas) and almost-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), sources said, along with leadership figure Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-Ga.), Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (Texas) and Diane Black (Tenn.).

Philip Anschutz, the billionaire GOP donor whose company owns a stake in Sea Island, was also there, along with Democratic Rep. John Delaney, who represents Maryland. Arthur Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York Times, was there, too, a Times spokeswoman confirmed.







Friday, March 4, 2016

John Kasich A Fraud By Claiming He's Anti Establishment?

Ohio Governor Kasich had hoped to win New Hampshire an early primary state, spending more time than other candidates in a state effort that didn't pay off. Also, Kasich spent most of his supporters money in that failed effort.

Today, Kasich who claims he's still the non establishment candidate seems more than willing to help the establishment usurp the voice of party voters in favor of a brokered convention.  That's something the establishment clearly wants. This from Kasich who touts himself the honorable candidate and one who's taken the high road? It's clearly for personal gain Kasich suggests a brokered convention is preferable over the people's voice. This probably won't set well in the state of Ohio and they've not voted yet.  Those who've voted in primary states to date have selected Trump and like it or not there's no better system than an election by the people to be governed.  What's Kasich doing by suggesting otherwise to Ohio's voters?

Obviously the anti establishment candidate has become the establishment candidate.

Furthermor, Kasich's  got a penchant for making some bone headed statements. For starters he said ILLEGALS are a ‘critical part of our society’?  That's not something Republican voters will likely forget. Continuing here's a chauvinist statement Kasich made and it's a real beauty: Women Voters ‘Left Their Kitchens’ to Campaign for me. And lets not forget Kasich came under fire for a story he told during a campaign stop in California about tipping the Hispanic maid in his hotel. "They are great, caring, hardworking folks. And a lot of them do jobs that, that they're willing to do," Kasich said, "That's why in the hotel you leave a little tip, you know?  Wow!!

Now lets compare, Trump commented on Mexico not sending America their best. That's actually not a racial comment given Mexico's a country and not a race.  However, it's drawn a lot of media and party attention who like to create false controversy where none exists. Trump also said "a lot of them I assume (Mexicans) are good people who come to America". The fact is many Mexican Americans agree with Trump and the facts side with Trump a lot of crime (gangs) and drugs are crossing the southern border. Trumps advocating a wall and legal vs. ILLEGAL immigration. Trump wants to enforce current immigration law.  "A nation without borders is not a nation at all" he claims.  That's something that should resonate well with Republican voters across the board.

At the moment Trump leads Ohio state polls between himself and Kasich. This underscores how unpopular Kasich actually is in his home state.  Voters in Ohio have suggested the reason Kasich's governor in the first place has more to do with Democrat Ed FitzGerald's blunders than  actual appeal on the part of Kasich. Ohio voters can't help but recognize Kasich's shown lower energy than even Jeb Bush while campaigning. Trump was successful at making the "low energy label" stick to Bush who's since dropped out of the campaign.

It's expected pro establishment Super PAC money will be spent heavily in Ohio supporting a thus far failed Kasich in an effort to stop Trump. Clearly Kasich has no chance of beating Trump on his own. Nationwide party voters have unanimously voted for Trump and today are pinning hopes that voters of Ohio ally with them and reject the establishment. An establishment who's effort is to defeat its own front runner Donald Trump. Ohio's voters are a crucial constituency in every election.  This time's no different and that constituency can decide whether or not the Republican establishment continues with business as usual or whether they side with regular party voters.  Voters who've thus far supported a transformation away from business as usual.

Who Ohioans decide to vote for will hopefully be decided by the nations best interests and not the establishment Super PACs.  Trump and his supporters are taking Ohio very seriously and they're hoping that Ohio will join them in a search for fare trade, a strong military, support of the police departments around the nation, secure borders and enforcement of current immigration law among other commonsense themes.

Thursday, March 3, 2016

The Real Fraud And Phoney Is Mitt Romney




Ronald Reagan
Cultural studies at the distinguished and renowned Heritage Foundation
 
Interesting take on Trump.

William J. Bennett, Host of Bill Bennett's Morning in America Show, is one of America's most important, influential, and respected voices on cultural, political, and education issues.

What I See Happening In a Trump Presidency
By Bill Bennett - (and modified by this site)

They would see Trump killed, before they let him be president . It could be a Republican or a Democrat that instigates the silencing of Trump and the people who voted for him. Don’t be surprised if Trump has an accident. Some in establishment are getting nervous: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and not just establishment Republicans.

There's an over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians, the media, and the biggest corporations of America. Its been swift and unjustly angry, suggesting they're all threatened and frightened of the truth. No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business, and political elite understand that Trump is no joke. He could actually win. They've gotten together to destroy Trump's voice. It's because many politicians are part of the boys club. They talk big, but they won’t change a thing. They are all beholden to money.

They're owned in many cases by lobbyists for unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations, or multinational corporations. Sometimes owned by foreigners like George Soros and his global view. But there's one man who isn't beholden to them, Donald Trump.

Donald Trump does care what the media says about him (who wouldn't), however, he's standing for his beliefs and for his supporters. He doesn’t care what Obama, Paul Ryan or Mitch McConnel have to say they've already sold themselves. That makes Trump dangerous to their entrenched interests. That makes him a huge threat to be removed or silenced.

Do conservatives wonder why Republicans haven't stopped Obama? Do they wonder why Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell talk a big game, but never actually try to stop Obama? Do they wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet has never tried to defund Obamacare or Obama’s clearly illegal executive action on amnesty for illegal aliens? It defies logic, right?

Are key Republicans being bribed? Or are key Republicans being blackmailed? Whether they are having affairs, secretly bisexual, or stealing taxpayer money, the National Security Agency knows everything. Ask former House Speaker Dennis Hastert about that. The government even knew he was withdrawing large sums of his own money from his own bank account. The NSA, the SEC, the IRS, and all the other three-letter government agencies are watching every Republican political leader. They surveil everything.

Republicans are petrified of being called racists, so they are scared to ever criticize Obama or call out his own racism, (huge hypocrisy) let alone demand Obama's accountability for crimes like using the IRS to intimidate Republicans or autidt them for leverage. Ironically Republicans will and have cried Racism in trying to silence Trump. When all else fails this has always worked for them if the cry is maintaned and amplified enough! Forget that Trump's from N.Y. city and has a proven record of inclusivness... Facts no longer matter.  What matters is that Trump is silenced and that his support is labled as misinformed.  Forget that being Muslim is a choice and not a race or that Mexico's a country and not a race.

Why rock the boat? After defeat or retirement, if you’re a good old boy, you’ve got a lush lobbying job waiting. The big-money interests have the system gamed. Win or lose, they win. But Trump doesn’t play by any of those rules. All the rules are out the window if Trump wins the Presidency. The Republicans will protect Obama and his aides but not Trump why?

Trump is questioning the one sided relationship with Mexico; he's questioning why the border is wide open; he's questioning why no wall has been built across the border; he's questioning if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; he's questioning why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes, yet are not deported; and he's questioning why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad. Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick. Good question!

Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollar amount given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama. He will question the defective Obamacare website. By the way, that tab is now in the $5 billion range.

Trump will ask if Obamacare's architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. Trump will investigate Obama's widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama's college records. Trump will prosecute Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover up Benghazi before the election. How about the fraud committed by employees of the Labor Department when they made up dramatic job numbers in the last jobs report before the 2012 election?

Obama, the multinational corporations and the media need to stop Trump. They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked, telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask, Trump could wake a sleeping giant.

Trump's election would be a nightmare. Obama has committed many crimes. No one else but Trump would dare to prosecute. He will not hesitate. Once Trump gets in and gets a look at the cooked books and Obama's records, the game is over. The jig is up. The goose is cooked. Holder could wind up in prison. Jarrett could wind up in prison. Obama bundler Corzine could wind up in prison for losing $1.5 billion of customer money.

Clinton could wind up in jail for deleting 32,000 emails or for accepting bribes from foreign governments while Secretary of State, or for misplacing $6 billion as the head of the State Department, or for lying about Benghazi. The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison.

Obamacare will be de-funded and dismantled. Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters. Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved. That’s why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump. His business dealings everything will be used as a means to destroy him.

Yes, it's become open season on Donald Trump. The left and the right are determined to attack, harm his businesses and if possible, silence the will of those who support Trump. And they are sure they can intimidate us. They've allways done it and will do it again right?

Hopefully, the more the elites try, the more the public will realize that Trump's the one telling the truth.

Cheers John
"Be who you are and say what you feel; because, those who matter, don't mind and those who mind, don't matter."

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Super Tuesday: Landslide Win For Trump

Donald Trump dominates Super Tuesday winning the following states;

Alabama with 43.4% of the vote
Arkansas with 32.7% of the vote
Georgia with 38.8% of the vote
Massachusetts with 49% of the vote
Tennessee with 38.9% if the vote
Vermont with 32.7% of the vote
Virginia with 34.7% of the vote

Those are sizable percentages considering four other candidates are still vying for the Republican presidential nomination. The amount of money the "establishment" has squandered trying to stop their own front runner is disgraceful. Donald Trump's wins in the face of the onslaught underscores the peoples support for him and against what the establishment is doing.

The Republican establishment moves are tarnishing the Republican brand and are in direct conflict with the message the PEOPLE are sending.

Spelling it out for the obtuse,  the people who've voted Trump want the establishment to spend its money defending against the lefts racism and the lefts policy of  categorizing people based on skin color. The people don't condone the establishment Republicans inflaming the lefts "false outrage" over Trump's comments and helping the left create false charges of racism against Mr. Trump.

Had the establishment backed Donald Trump going into "Super Tuesday" with the very same money the've spent trashing his immage and thus their own, Trump would have already largely put the nomination away. The media is not favorable to Republicans and that will remain the case no matter who the Republicans put forward. It's time for the establishment to unite the party behind Donald Trump or tarnish the republican brand for years to come. Trump had a huge polling lead going into the Oklahoma primary (34%) and ended up placing with (28.3%) and for what purpose? The establishment is supporting a protracted feud where it's Republican vs Republican and they wonder why Trump has a broad appeal?

It's time for two things to occur Donald Trump must act Presidential and the establishment must stand up to the media in unified fashion.  Trumps already offered an olive branch and a glimpse of what he can be in terms of  a unifying force for the party.  It's time to bury the hatchet on the part of the establishment. This is clearly what the people in the party are asking from establishment. What the people don't want are RINO's whom fear the lefts false charges of racism and charges that world leaders are aghast with the goings on in America. Party voters are trying to elect someone who will stand up for America! It's time for the establishment to put their weight behind the peoples voice. If the establishment won't support Donald Trump they've confirmed for voters in the party they have no voice and the party of the right has indeed become the Democrat light party.  One can't forget that Ted Cruz is not the establishment choice either.  While Trump isn't Cruz on all issues, he's the loudest conservative voice where it matters most to the voters!  Border enforcement, a strong military, fare trade, support for police, and common bonds that unite a country.  Those are more important issues than who's having an abortion and who's not. And guess what they're less divisive!

Those who say Trump can't win are dead WRONG.  Donald Trump is leading a movement and that movement includes the potential to win states like New York and New Hampshire in the general election. Winning those states all but guarantees Donald Trump instead of a Democrat becoming the next President of the United States.  See; Hillary could lose to Trump in Democratic NY.  Trump could even win Massachusetts!  See; 20 percent of Massachussetts Democrats would defect for Trump.

Republican voters are imploring the establishment to fight for their choice over the media's objections and their own perceptions of Trump.  It's time to spend the money supporting the peoples voice. A Trump loss at the polls this far into the game will only serve to perpetuate support of business as usaul over the will of the people.  Yes, the establishment money can still hijack the peoples choice and claim in their defense that the people did reject Trump.  Don't count on the people who've already voiced support for Trump to except that narrative.  The balls in the establishments court. Are they capable of change or will they remain lost in an effort to silence a movement that clearly wants change?

The establishment needs to bear in mind Ted Cruz has less chance of winning the general election than any candidate still campaigning. Cruz is divisive no matter how they slice it and the establishment has already all but admitted as much. Promoting a RINO robot like Marco Rubio who's still polling behind Trump in his home state of Florida at this juncture is asinine, whether or not establishment money and endorsements can change that outcome. It's still WRONG to try. Support the people in your own party or don't forget to look in the mirror as the party is destroyed by your own doing.

General election polls aren't reliable because the election is determined by the states electoral college and Trump has a real advantage in that arena. If general election polls were correct Ronald Reagan would have lost by 20 percent to Jimmy Carter.  That clearly did not happen! Thank God!

See; Trump can beat Clinton

Sessions: Trump can beat Hillary

Why Americans Love Donald Trump

After almost eight years of Barrack Obama the country has not united and both the Democrats and establishment Republicans are to blame.  Enter Donald Trump who's music to the ears of a multitude of Americans for different reasons.  To European Americans it's resentment of being the majority voice that nobody pays any attention, unless for the purpose of pinning blame for the nations ills. For African Americans it's the failure of delivery on massive promises that are never kept and the fealing that they remain second class citizens. For Latino American "citizens" it's listening to the continued debate on ILLEGAL immigration and feeling as if they are always being blamed for crime\drugs flowing across the border. They have no more contol over that than anyone else except at the ballot box.

Like it or not, voters from diverse ethnic backgrounds want a wall at the American\Mexican border. Trump's been correct in saying "a nation without secure borders is no nation at all". European Americans want the wall because it's non European immigration they fear\blame for the 'browning" of America. President Obama's done nothing to belay that fear either. For African Americans they've been replaced as the number one minority group and the perception of lost employemnt due to ILLEGAL immigration exists. In fact tension sometimes exists between the African American and Latino American communities. Some Latino Americans feel it's time to get the borders under control so that debate can move towards more important issues with less time being spent on crime and drugs that often come across the boarder. Until the issue is resolved Latino Americans will continue being stereo typed in an ufavorable way. All groups have some fact shaping their perceptions.

Until a walls built and racial issues can be addressed without charge from the left and establishment Republicans on the right of racism, nothing will change. Donald Trump's blatantly honest and often politically incorect conversation is seen as a beacon or ray light in regards to this issue. Instead of trying to understand the Trump appeal both Democrats and Republicans stick there heads in the sand clinging to the old established ways that no longer work in today's American society.

There are two parties in this country for a reason, to debate the real issues without imposing them. Sometimes the opposition party actually has a good idea.  While many Republicans don't agree with the Democrats re-establishing a relationship with Cuba it's actually good for both America and Cuba provided it's handled through Republican ideas such as free markets and not government reperation. Both America and Cuba harmed each other and both nations lost for years. The economic rebalancing act can be handled through free markets. Though no fan here of Barrack Obama the normalizing of American Cuban relations will be one of if not the most important achievements of his tenure.

Racial issues need to be discussed and just like the Cuban issue both parties have skin in the game and neither party is correct without the other. Here's one idea that makes sense, how about encouraging European immigration again and from South Africa?  It may sound controversial to non European Americans, however, the cries been America is a nation of compassion, does that not extend to Europeans anymore? If not why not and what's the agenda?  Today Eurpean immigration from South Africa makes sense for compassionate reasons. Some Europeans in South Africa don't feal safe since the fall of apartied and are looking for a nation where they'd feel safe. Taking them in would suggest to European Americans the goal of the current immigration policy isn't the disappearance of European America. In reality it won't stop the "browning" of America and for this reason minorities need not fear it. Proportionate Eurpean immigration will stop what currently looks to be an intentional call for the destruction of the European culture.  Getting rid of this fear should allow for real dialog in areas that address, say, African American concerns today.  There will be trade offs on many issues between ethnic groups. Immigration will continue from minority nations as well, however, all immigration should be at a pace that America can sustain. Thus, keeping up with common bonds such as language and culture remains possible. Nations need that glue. Without a common glue nations can cease to exist.

There are so many immigrants willing to come here from a world with a population in the billions. America can't handle this huge influx without destroying itself.  Interacial marriages occur and capitalism is the most non discriminatory system on the plannet let those forces happen over time and naturally.  Allowing this would be the opposite of the socialist policies that grip much of the rest of the world and are clearly destroying both European and African nations alike.

Voters from both the Democrat and Republican parties want fare trade and support for fare trade comes from all ethnic groups in America.  That's one thing Americans have in common.  How America has managed to destroy its own industrial base is to be blamed on both political parties and YES, that blame is well placed.  Trump is resonating here on this issue and he's not pandering to anyone.

Fringe groups support whomever they want and they're part of America's electorate. Donald Trump has disavowed the one fringe group, the Ku Klux Klan, who actually hasn't endorsed him officially. Has Obama done the same when the Black Panthers stood with Obama? These are serious issues and they go both ways. Republican House Speaker. Paul Ryan would be wise to tone down his one sided attacks on Trump containing his false outrage lest he become the first Republican establishment official to fall. Ryan is wrong to come out publicly and harshly on a fake issue. Trump has a long history, it's clearly not in support of the Ku Klux Klan.  Ryan wants Trump to disavow the Klan when in fact Trump has already done so.  It won't be the last time either.

Trump's an unknown to the establishment taking from both Democrat and Republican parties alike. Trump's not controlled by special interests and he knows what needs to be done. Establishment Republicans like Ryan can't understand this and maybe need to re-evaluate why their own parties voters support Trump. Trump comes from New York, City and as such he's plenty inclusive. The fact is Ted Cruz attacked Trump on his being from New York and having New York values and Cruz lost hugely on that exchange.

All minorities don't enjoy the pandering and "false outrage" included in today's politics. Those minorities who've been turned off by the pandering are lining up for Trump and against establishment insanity. At the moment Paul Ryan is looking like he may become the first casualty in the establishment war with Trump. Many blue collar Americans are sick of Ryan. Each time Ryan opens his mouth against their vote for Mr. Trump they grow more resolve.  That resolve may move to calls of removing Paul Ryan from office.